Recently I had the need to purchase a MIDI controller keyboard for my own music production interests. My requirements included programmable sliders and encoders, as well as a minimum of 49 'piano' keys, velocity action and drum pads. I also wanted to keep things as inexpensive as possible. I'm not a live keyboard player, so I aim to use this device for music composition, with programs such as Reason.
I narrowed the field down to the following three models:
- Edirol PCR-M50 - NZ$400 from the Rockshop.
- Akai MPK49 - NZ$800 from the Rockshop.
- Korg Kontrol49 - NZ$800 from Peter Jamieson Audio Limited.
I was able to quickly eliminate the Edirol, because I felt the feature set was too limited for the level of control I was after. This left the Korg and the Akai.
First, the Korg Kontrol49. Peter from Peter Jamieson Audio Limited graciously agreed to lend me a unit for a weekend trial - without this opportunity, my choice would have been much, much harder to make.
The Korg is an excellent piece of gear. I was impressed with the way it worked in Reason - especially the feedback that comes through and labels the controls. I had no trouble installing it and getting started. From what I can tell, it's extremely configurable and can probably do anything MIDI-wise you'd ever need to do.
I had read a lot about the Akai MPK49, which seems to be the closest competitor to the Korg. In comparisons, I read a lot of speculative opinion either way which made me uneasy, so I decided the only way to know for sure was to try it myself. Mark at the Rockshop in Lower Hutt agreed to let me trial the Akai so I was able to set both keyboards up next to each other at home, and make my own hands-on comparisons.
Here's what I found.
- the Korg provides a much better level of feedback, especially with Reason. You can easily tell what a particular control will do by the label sent from the PC. However, because each encoder and slider share a single display, and it only shows the last control moved, you can't see what the label for the other control is until you move it. However, in this area it still wins because the Akai doesn't do anything like this at all.
- The Korg is a 2004 product, the Akai is 2007.
- The Korg is slightly bigger and slightly lighter than the Akai.
- The build quality of the Korg is somewhat lower than the Akai. For example, the encoder knobs and sliders on the Korg are a bit flimsy and can move side-to-side. The Akai controls are very solid in feel. I also prefer the pitch-bend and mod wheels on the Akai as they are larger and have a better (rubbery) surface.
- the pads on the Korg are really cool - the different coloured lights tell you what pads are playing when reviewing a drum pattern, for example. The feel of them is good. The Akai has only 12 pads, no visual feedback, but interestingly I found they had a better strike response and I found it easier to 'play' the drums on the Akai.
- The Akai keyboard has a better feel than the Korg, in my opinion.
- The Akai has features that the Korg lacks - aftertouch on keys (Korg has an aftertouch send but it's global), note-repeat, built-in arpeggiator. However the Korg has the X-Y joystick, but unfortunately it has a 'dead-zone' in the centre which makes the input non-linear.
- The Akai has dedicated transport controls - so does the Korg, but I found the Akai ones easier to use. The Korg can be configured so that any button will transmit 'record' or 'rewind' but it can be complicated and there are no dedicated controls.
- The included "library" software is quite minimal with the Korg. The Akai software is better as it allows you to set up the keyboard using a graphical representation, and then send this config to the keyboard in a single operation. It also has a MIDI monitor which is useful for debugging MIDI messages and assignments.
I've spent a lot of time comparing these products and my final conclusion is that although the Korg is excellent, it unfortunately falls short of the Akai for my requirements.
Many thanks to Peter at Peter Jamieson Audio Limited, and Mark at the Rockshop Lower Hutt for enabling me to make this hands-on comparison.
Postscript
I have been using the Akai for about a week now. I am very impressed with this keyboard. It has an excellent feel and now I'm used to the controls it's very easy to get around the configuration. Although it lacks the direct feedback Reason has with the Korg, it doesn't take too long to learn which controls affect which parameters on each instrument.
Final note - the YouTube videos by "TodaysbeatsTV" on the MPK49 are a complete waste of time. Yes, there's some info there, but the presenter rambles on and on and ON and ON. Just make sure the MPK49 clock is set to internal if you want to drive the MIDI clock from the keyboard. Pretty obvious really.
Great review, and very useful, thx! I've been using Kontrol49 for two years, but I feel the same problems with Korg as you exprerienced, so now it's time, I try to replace it to MPK49! :)
ReplyDeleteAndras
Great Blog, great review. Got to know your site when i just googled "akai mpk49 pads better", because I found them to be too hard. It helped me a lot, thanks. I also thought of buying the KORG, like you - and I'm glad to read this, because I just bought the MPK49 because it was cheaper in my hometown.
ReplyDeleteMy Question:
Do you work with the internal or external midi clock? And why?
(I noticed that there are some issues with the "record", "fast forward" and "rewind" buttons. This only occurs whenever the midi clock is set to internal. If I choose Reason for being my midi clock master, everytging works just fine without any differences.)
Thanks. The modified pads on my MPK49 are holding up pretty well so far.
ReplyDeleteI find the whole internal/external MIDI clock issue a bit confusing in practice. I've used both and I've definitely seen the Transport issues with Internal. Some time ago I wrote to Propellerhead about it and the response indicated that there's no planned (or known) fix. That said, it still works reasonably well in internal mode, but I must admit I do almost everything with external clock unless I want to use the MPK's arp or note-repeat modes. Reason's built-in arpeggiator module is pretty good for this anyway so I rarely switch to internal midi clock these days. Hope this answers your question?
Thanks for your quick response!
ReplyDeleteI was just wondering why it's so important to ensure that the MPK is the MIDI clock master (according to the Reason manual). It says that though Reason works fine with it's own MIDI clock, you should use an external to be able to take advance of all the features of Reason. I thought that this would only count for the arp and note repeat, and you confirmed it – thanks!
I read a post on the Propellerhead forums written by someone who wrote to both Propellerhead and Akai. Both companies told him that it's not their fault – so Akai thinks that Propellerhead should fix it, and vice versa. Really annoying!
Now, everything is clear and I can start making beats! :-)
PS: Even though I really trust you, I'll try a fourth layer of cloth tape tonight. :D
Heanz: any chance you could post a link to the conversation you mentioned on the Prop forums please?
ReplyDeleteYep, sure:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.propellerheads.se/forum/showthread.php?p=864718#post864718